Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3755 14
Original file (NR3755 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUARL FORK CORREUTIVIN UT INAV AL RECORUS

PA ee RAR te ee ee Sullo tue

ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN
Docket No.NRO3755-14

15 September 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

Tor Secretary of the Navy

emanates aaa erties = cnastoat
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Fnel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Memorandum from the Deputy, Officer Career
Progression (PERS-801) 5420 PERS-80 of 21 Aug 2014

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that
the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was
selected to LT/0-3 from the All Fully Qualified List with an
effective date of 9 February 2014.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Ruskin and Exnicios
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10
September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit
and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration

 

DoE ket WNo.NRUS/35-44

of all the eviaence of record, and

especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following

corrective action.

 

RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,

as follows:

a. Petitioner’s Date of Rank to LT/0-3 is corrected to show
an effective date of 9 February 2014.

Note: Corrected Date of Rank is contingent upon Petitioner being
listed on the FY-15 All Fully Qualified LT Promotion List.

>. Petitioner is authorized all back pay and allowances

from the effective date forward.

c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in

Petitioner’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's

proceedings in the above entitled matsex.7 //

   

(|

   

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures ©

—f the Board for Correction of

Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e) )
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on

behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

15 September 2014

 

 

 
 

ROBERT J. oO’ NEILL
Executive Director

a

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3304 13

    Original file (NR3304 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s date of rank should be 18 May 2007 vice 11 February 2008, and that he be promoted to LCDR/0-4 from the FY13 Navy-Reserve Promotion Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 November 2013 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3778 14

    Original file (NR3778 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    enclosure (2), the office having in Petitioner's application it and warrants b. and consideration © in light of the cont ce warranting Upon review especially existence of an injusti RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as follows: t and Els hig Reserve Oath of office on 21 June petitioner accept @ HD wc CG C 0 @m K Cc b Kw ed 2009 vic f Rank to LT/O-3 is corrected to show an b. Petitioner’s Date o 09 vice 19 June 2012. effective date of 21 June...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0747 14

    Original file (NR0747 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Docket No:NRO0747-14 CONCLUSTON Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4193 14

    Original file (NR4193 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his Time in Rate to E-5/MM2 be restored to March 2011 and that he was authorized to take the March 2014 E-6/JIM1 advancement examination. The Board, cons .sting of Ms. Davis, Ms. Wilcher and Mr. Grover reviewed Petitioner|s allegations of error and injustice on 15 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4931-13

    Original file (NR4931-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to adjust reserve appointment date. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5285 14

    Original file (NR5285 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NR05285-14 26 November 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy subj: eee Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) letter 5420 Ser 91/204 of 4 Nov 2014 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8264 13

    Original file (NR8264 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record reflect the reentry code of RE-3E (Inducted/Enlisted/Extended/Reenlisted in é recommended for reenlistment) in block 27 0 Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) 1s cS 30 May 2012. The Board, consisting of ee fa reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2014, and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5096 14

    Original file (NR5096 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds an error and injustice warranting the following corrective action: RECOMMENDATION : a. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5096 14

    Original file (NR5096 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds an error and injustice warranting the following corrective action: RECOMMENDATION : a. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2889 14

    Original file (NR2889 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to ET1/E6 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on.the...